A longstanding dispute over executive compensation at SL Green Realty, one of New York City’s largest commercial landlords, has reignited as Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) called on investors to vote against the company’s latest pay proposal. ISS, a key advisory firm influencing shareholder decisions, criticized the new severance benefits as overly generous, highlighting concerns about excessive executive payouts amid ongoing scrutiny of corporate governance in the real estate sector.

SL Green, headquartered in Midtown Manhattan and owning some of the city’s most iconic office towers, has faced pushback over its compensation packages for nearly a decade. The current controversy centers on a revamped severance plan that ISS argues lacks sufficient performance criteria and could reward executives disproportionately, even in less favorable company performance scenarios. This development comes as SL Green navigates a challenging office market recovery post-pandemic, with pressures mounting on shareholder returns.

The renewed call from ISS is likely to influence the upcoming shareholder meeting, where the compensation package will be a central agenda item. Proxy advisory firms like ISS wield significant sway in shaping investor votes, especially among institutional shareholders who hold large stakes in publicly traded companies like SL Green. The firm’s stance reflects a broader trend in New York’s corporate landscape toward demanding tighter alignment of executive pay with company performance and shareholder interests.

SL Green’s management has defended the proposed severance benefits as competitive and necessary to retain top leadership during a period of economic uncertainty and industry transformation. The company emphasized its commitment to transparency and responsiveness to shareholder feedback. However, the ongoing dispute underscores the persistent tension between real estate executives’ compensation ambitions and shareholder expectations in a city where real estate remains a vital economic pillar.

As this pay dispute unfolds, it casts a spotlight on corporate governance practices in New York’s real estate sector, a space closely watched by investors and regulators alike. The outcome of the shareholder vote will not only shape SL Green’s leadership incentives but also signal how aggressively investors are willing to challenge executive compensation plans in 2026’s evolving market environment.

Editorial Transparency. A first draft of this story was produced with AI-assisted writing tools, then reviewed for accuracy and tone by the named editor before publication. More on our process: Editorial Policy.