A Manhattan judge declared a mistrial on Friday in the third rape case against Harvey Weinstein after the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. The trial centered on allegations that the former film producer sexually assaulted Jessica Mann, a hairstylist and actress, at a Manhattan hotel in 2013. After days of deliberation, the panel of seven men and five women remained deadlocked, prompting the judge to call an end to the proceedings without a verdict.

Weinstein, now 74, has faced multiple criminal prosecutions over the past years as part of the #MeToo movement’s reckoning with abuses in the entertainment industry. This latest trial was seen as a pivotal moment in the ongoing efforts to hold the disgraced mogul accountable for alleged sexual misconduct. The mistrial adds another layer of uncertainty regarding Weinstein’s legal future in New York.

The jury’s inability to agree underscores the complexities of prosecuting historical sexual assault cases, especially when evidence and testimonies are contested. Jessica Mann testified that Weinstein assaulted her during a hotel stay, but the defense challenged her account and credibility. Both sides presented extensive arguments, but the jury’s deadlock reflects the difficulties in reaching consensus in such high-profile cases.

With this mistrial, prosecutors must decide whether to pursue a retrial or explore alternative legal routes. Weinstein remains incarcerated on separate charges in Los Angeles, adding further complexity to his legal battles. The outcome of this case continues to resonate across Manhattan’s legal and cultural landscape, highlighting the challenges in addressing sexual assault allegations against powerful figures.

Editorial Transparency. A first draft of this story was produced with AI-assisted writing tools, then reviewed for accuracy and tone by the named editor before publication. More on our process: Editorial Policy.